Insurance Software Development Services for Insurers, MGAs and Insurtechs

An Openkoda implementation gets a written ballpark after the scoping call, plus the platform subscription from Openkoda. Work on your existing systems is priced per offer: time and materials phases with a ballpark estimate, a support retainer or a monthly team fee. The cost depends on how many products you carry, how unusual your rules are and how many systems need integrating; within a week you get the range and what moves it.

Core Travel Insurance went live in eight weeks. A single-product launch with few integrations takes about that long. Replacing a live core takes longer and runs one product line at a time, with old and new in parallel until you trust the new one.

Usually yes, and on modernization projects that is the point: the new system runs alongside the old one and takes over gradually. The constraints are what the incumbent can expose and how reliably, which we establish before the ballpark because it shapes the whole plan.

No. It is the platform we recommend when you are launching products or replacing a core and it fits. When it does not, the same engineers implement and integrate on whatever you run. The written ballpark is where that gets decided.

Openkoda is built and sold by our sister company, with its own books; work between the two companies is priced at arm's length. We recommend it only where it fits, and the same engineers implement and integrate on whatever core you already run when it does not.

A boutique team of senior engineers, every one a direct employee, with no subcontracting. For an insurer that means the people who scope your implementation are the people who build it, a short supplier chain for your third-party risk review, and an exit plan written into the contract.

Not to us: your configuration, integrations and custom modules live in repositories you control, ownership is assigned to you, and handover is part of every implementation scope. The platform license is between you and Openkoda.

On openkoda.com, which publishes the product, its pricing and comparisons with other platforms. This site covers what an implementation costs and how long it takes, and we keep the two apart.

Because the products are the differentiator, and a platform encodes someone else's idea of what an insurance product is until it is configured and integrated for yours. If your products are entirely standard, buy a platform and configure it yourself; that is the cheaper answer and we will say so.

Openkoda as the platform where it fits, with custom modules and integrations written in Java and Spring by the same engineers. Where a model sits in a rating, claims or underwriting path, Spring AI, with the logging and review points the AI Act asks for.

A live insurance system it has delivered, and how long that took. Ask whether the company starts from a policy model or an empty repository, how it runs old and new cores in parallel, and who owns the code at the end. Our reference is Core Travel Insurance, live on Openkoda eight weeks after contract.